Committee
Members Physically
Present:
Dennis N. Thompson, Chair
Leslie-Anne Englehaupt
David O. Mallery
Committee
Member Absent
Others Physically Present:Larry
D. Huffman, Board Member
Jerry
Corcoran, President
Rick
Pearce, Vice President for Learning and Student Development
Cheryl
Roelfsema, Vice President for Business Services and Finance
Lori Scroggs,
Vice President for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness
Gary Johnson,
Director of Facilities
Paul Basalay,
Architect
Dominick
Demonica, Architect
Bill Serre, KJWW
Engineer
Greg Mitchell,
KJWW Engineer
The meeting was called to order at 4 p.m. by Mr. Thompson,
committee chair.
UPDATE ON DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS
Initial Asbestos Review
Mr. Basalay reported fifty
percent of the work has been done on the design development documents for the
Community Technology Center (CTC). The
completion date to send the documents to the Capital Development Board (CDB) is
the end of the month. United Analytical
Services has completed the initial asbestos review and found the existing
asbestos management reports are old and incomplete. There will need to be additional testing done
in the existing buildings for Phases 1 and 3.
The recommendation is to do $2,940 of testing for Phase 1 for demolition
of parts of Building F; $9,400 of testing for Phase 2 for demolition of the
temporary buildings; and $9,590 of testing for Phase 3 areas; with a 15%
contingency for additional testing that may be necessary as results from the
original test are received. This
recommendation was approved by CDB to proceed.
The tests need to be completed before the deadline date so that costs
will be included in the project budget.
If the asbestos is more than $100,000, the amount will be taken from
project costs. Tort funds cannot be used
for the testing, but PHS funds are eligible.
Mr. Basalay recommended to the administration to redo the asbestos
manuals to prevent additional testing in the future. IDEAL is conducting the testing now. Once the costs are in, a decision will be
made on whether to seek bids. The
question was asked if the asbestos management reports for Building C were
complete and the answer was the architects will need to get this information
from CDB.
Assessment of Existing Berm
and Proposed Wet Land Detention Basin
McCleary Engineering evaluated
the new proposed wetlands to see if there were any potential problems. The results were good except for the original
berm area where the factor of safety was slightly below the recommended
level. There were no soil borings done
at this location. Chamlin and Associates
plan to provide additional work at this berm area and additional testing during
construction to confirm that it will meet or exceed the required safety
factor.
Existing Water Line Locate
In trying to locate the water
main to the main campus, it became very difficult because the metal pipe
changed over to plastic pipe in front of Building F. After attempts of witching and sound
detection, a good location could not be found.
The only method left was to dig up the area in front of Building F. After reviewing the cost of digging against
the possible additional cost during construction if the water line is not where
it is shown, it was decided to not dig now and wait until construction. Mr. Basalay wanted the Facilities Committee
to be aware that there might be a possible change order.
Additional Team Members
Basalay, Cary, & Alstadt
Architects have hired two additional team members. The first is Sanders Design Group, a
landscape consultant, to assist with LEED landscaping in Phase 1. The second is Mackesey and Associates of
Illinois, a kitchen consultant, to help with planning the small kitchen in
Phase 1. These are specialty items and
the cost will be paid by Basalay.
LEED Certification
Mr. Basalay reported the CTC is
on target for LEED silver as required (with a chance of gold). The points are not determined until the
building is complete. Mr. Basalay will
be in charge of the documents for the LEED process.
REVIEW OF GEOTHERMAL
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
The architects had a request from
a board member to look into a one-pipe geothermal system as compared to a
two-pipe system. The one-pipe geothermal
system is basically the same system in the field but distributes the
warmed/cooled water from the wells throughout the building with one supply pipe
instead of a supply and return. This
makes the system less expensive. It
requires more pumps, but they are smaller.
The system works by taking the warmed/cooled water to the first unit and
whatever it does not use goes to the second and so on down the line until after
the last unit, where it returns to the geo field. The end of the run may suffer and could even
need additional heating/cooling. There
are applications where this type of system could be used, but KJWW does not
recommend it for this application. The
rooms require better control than this system can provide and the two-pipe
system would have better payback. KJWW
recognized that the proposed system does cost more but recommends it to provide
overall better performance and satisfaction.
Mr. Mallery was under the impression the savings between the one-pipe
system and the one recommended could be $500,000. KJWW did not believe the savings would be
that much if the VRF system and the same type of controls were used on the
one-pipe system. The recommended system
could be lowered in cost by reducing the quality of the controls and not doing
VRF if this was the College’s goal. It
was decided to stay with the better controls and have KJWW have cost
information on savings if the one-pipe system was used with the same VRF and
controls. Greg Mitchell, KJWW engineer,
pointed out that the one-pipe system would be less efficient and therefore not
cheaper over the life of the system.
Cost information will be available at completion of the design
development.
REVIEW OF EXTERIOR
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
Dominick Demonica presented
updated building elevations and reviewed exterior materials. The upper level on the back of the building
will be a metal siding. The upper level
of the rest of the building will be precast concrete with a rough texture,
similar to the current building. The
lower level will be elongated stone similar to what is found in the
region. Originally large metal panels
were to be used on the curved portion over the main door and the east
entrance. Due to the restriction of
bending the large panels, smaller zinc panels were recommended. After a lengthy discussion, the board decided
the “curved” look was the most important aspect and the small zinc panels will
be used. “Wood look” paneling will also
be used at the bottom of the curved portion and as a trim along the curved
portion. In order to prevent the
classrooms on the south side of the building to become overheated, Mr. Demonica
presented a revised window layout and possible sun shade/light shelves. Light shelves would be installed to control
the heat from the sun but keep the light.
The shelves would help in the overall efficiency of the building, but it
would not go towards LEED Certification.
Pictures of the sun shades were presented and the committee was not
impressed with the look. In addition,
blinds or shades would need to be installed for darkening the room for
PowerPoint presentations. The committee
asked the architects to compare the cost of sun shades vs. better window
coatings to achieve the same effect. The
committee also discussed the amount of windows and the location of the windows
in the classrooms. Mr. Demonica will get back to the committee on different
options.
REVIEW OF LANDSCAPING
CONCEPT
Mr. Demonica reviewed the
landscape concepts for Phase 1 so that the committee was aware of the
architect’s direction before the design documents were submitted to CDB. Site boundaries needed to be established
before pursuing the open space credit and Mr. Demonica suggested including the
forested area going down to the river which has native vegetation. LEED requires 50% of the space minus the
building footprint to be planted with native vegetation which would amount to
900,000 square feet. With the existing
forested area of 800,000 square feet, an additional 100,000 square feet of
native planting would be needed. The
geothermal field could be planted with native grasses to satisfy LEED
Certification and still do some planting around the new building. The committee preferred the landscaping
around the CTC building to have a manicured appearance with a formal look at
the entries of the building and incorporate more native grasses as you leave
the area. Fill will need to be added to
the geothermal field, but the committee also wanted this area to look
attractive and not overgrown with native plantings. It was suggested to plant trees in the
islands of the new parking lot, but the administration indicated they have had
difficulties with trees in the current parking lots and did not want them in
the new lot. The landscaping will be
part of the bids. Mr. Demonica reported
there are four categories for LEED points – probable, medium, low, and
unlikely. Currently, IVCC has 44 points
in the probable category. To reach the
silver level, IVCC needs 50 points. Mr.
Demonica discussed some of the items that were included in the probable -
bicycle storage, alternative transportation, changing rooms and showers within
a certain distance, and parking spaces for low emitting vehicles. These parking spaces need to be identified
and be in the most convenient space to the door, second to the ADA spots. The spaces only need to be provided and not
policed.
2010 TAX LEVY PHS
PROJECTS
The Operations Committee, which
consists of administration, faculty, and staff met to review and discuss the
list of potential capital improvement projects.
Some projects have been on the list for a number of years. Under Protection, Health, and Safety (PHS)
projects, asbestos survey was added. The
Board had directed the project of upgrading the fire alarms to digital to be
taken out of the scope of the CTC building and add it to the list of PHS
projects. The relocation of the safety
service offices are in preparation for the CTC building. The project of securing the courtyard ramp
entrances/exits was discussed. If the
ramps are secured, there needs to be a way to exit and the board would like
this to be attractive. Mr. Thompson
would like more discussion on this project.
There were no additions to the non-PHS capital projects and slope
erosion was added to the list of maintenance repairs. Mr. Thompson asked that the slope erosion
control project be prioritized. This
will be an ongoing process and $50,000 will be placed in the 2010 budget. This is one area that might be mediated by
the construction process. Another project is the replacement of the water line
between Buildings C and G. This line has
had a couple of breaks in the last couple of years and needs to be
replaced. The 2010 tax levy is estimated
to be $1.6 million in revenues. The
recommended projects for the 2010 tax levy are the Physical Science Laboratory
Remodel for approximately $1,100,000 and the Upgraded Fire Alarm System to
Digital/Safety Service Office Relocation at a cost of approximately
$500,000. The Facilities Committee was
in agreement to direct Basalay, Cary, and Alstadt Architects to prepare the
necessary documentation for the recommended projects for the 2010 tax levy for
Board approval.
METEOROLOGICAL TOWER
Cheryl Roelfsema presented an
update on the meteorological tower. IVCC
applied for a grant from the Illinois Clean Energy Foundation to construct a
meteorological tower to measure the wind on the IVCC campus for a 12-month
period and was unsuccessful. IVCC reapplied
in January 2010 and has been invited to submit a more detailed
application. The results will be known
in the next month. The total cost of
the meteorological tower is $40,000 of which 75 percent will be funded by the
Illinois Clean Energy Foundation Grant, if IVCC is successful. The other $10,000 will be paid by the
College. Ameresco, Inc. has assisted
IVCC through this process. If
successful, IVCC will need to do proposals for a vendor to install the tower
and collect the data.
BASEBALL FIELD
IMPROVEMENTS
IVCC was asked to host a regional
baseball tournament in spring 2011. The
decision was made by the administration not to host the tournament because of
all the repairs that would be needed.
This brought to light many
concerns and the need to look into the baseball field. Improvements to be considered included 1)
install water and sewer lines [approximately $375,000], 2) build restrooms
[$375,000], repair dugouts [$10,000], install fencing on foul ball lines and
repair current fencing [$8,500], install new scoreboard [$4,999-$7,599], and
purchase tarps for covering the field [$5,000].
Mr. Thompson was in agreement to fix the dugouts and fencing, but installing
restrooms was a different situation and water and sewer lines are two different
things. Mr. Basalay reported there is a
pumping law - if a permanent building is erected, it must be hooked up to a
sewer. Mr. Thompson suggested
maintaining what we have and incorporating it into the budget. The larger items are capital improvements and
financially at this time would be very limited. Before any of the larger
improvements are made, the Board will need to decide if they want to expand the
south end of the campus and how much they want to spend. During discussion on this issue the following
ideas were suggested: 1) partner with a park district and make it nice, 2) add
soccer fields, 3) donate the property and let partners develop it, 4) install
lights to play during the summer, etc.
IVCC has contracted with Basalay,
Cary, and Alstadt through the schematic design phase and now through the design
development phase. Mr. Mallery asked,
“What will IVCC’s obligation be if CDB does not come up with the money?” The architect’s contract with CDB has
specific amounts for each phase. IVCC
has deposited money into an account to be used for the project. If CDB does not come up with the money, the
architects will get paid for the work they have completed. Mr. Mallery requested the total amount spent
as of this date. It is a large
investment but an investment that will always be there. If there is a delay in securing the money
from the state, IVCC will have completed the pre-planning work and will be that
much farther ahead when the money is available.
It is anticipated that the state will sell bonds soon. During the bidding stage, the Board has
authorization to decide on the alternates.
Once this decision is made CDB will make the decision on the contingency
money to keep the project moving.
The meeting adjourned at 6:38 p.m.